Posts
I'm so glad I'm not one of those unfortunate Labourites who has to choose. There's only 3 - all men - and they don't exactly inspire me.
There's a smug one who has an electorate in a poorer suburb but lives in a posh 'burb "for practical reasons'.
He's trying to look like the new messiah but really just looks smug. We've already got a smarmy smug git leading us. We certainly don't need another one. The trimmest of the 3 but that double chin is about to arrive.
There's the gay one who looks like a tubby public schoolboy. We might (well some of us anyway) be cool about sexuality there are a good many countries we deal with who aren't keen on the Mr. and Mr. notion. Has some intelligent ideas but not displaying much charisma..
Then there's the porn king. Also a bit of a chameleon. Good speaker - amusing with that common touch that makes people want to think he's representing them personally. Looks like he enjoys much fish and chips and beer.
Now one shouldn't judge on appearance but TV is the medium most folk get their information from, so you have to have something that the public likes the look of. Think of Shearer - the nicest guy in the world but his presentation was woeful.
Having to look at any one of this lot for 3 whole years plus the election run-up is enough to curdle the milk on your Weetbix..
It's almost enough to make one want to vote for Kim Dotcom's new party!
